Annual Report

2006

 2008            

2008 Annual Report

Issues

No Boost in CVB Funding for 2009 in Initial Action.  On July 17, the Senate Appropriations Committee reported the FY 2009 appropriations bill for USDA and related agencies. Following the pattern of recent years, the Senate committee gave the Center for Veterinary Biologics only a skimpy cost-of-living raise—a 2.3 percent increase from $16.541 million to $16.922 million. Overall, USDA’s funding would increase more than 7 percent if this bill were enacted, but APHIS would see a $6 million decrease in its funding (from $867 million to about $861 million). Contrary to tradition, the Senate committee acted before the House committee. The House Appropriations Committee had scheduled mark-up of the USDA appropriations bill for late June, but that was cancelled at the last minute, and it is not certain that the mark-up will be held before Congress’s August recess. The Committee keeps its recommendations more or less secret until the report of Committee action is published. The fiscal year starts October 1, but the conventional wisdom is that no appropriations bills will be passed on time this year. If not, as in the past several years, Congress will pass a “continuing resolution” which allows the federal agencies to continue to operate at last year’s funding level until the regular bills are passed. For FY 2008, the legislation was passed a couple days before Christmas.

VICH Steering Committee.  The VICH Steering Committee met on July 8 and 9, with AVBC represented by John Thomas. The Committee actions related to the regulation of veterinary biologics include the following:

Target Animal Batch Safety Testing Guideline: In late June, the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) circulated a proposal for a new biologics topic, which AVBC members were asked to comment on. The proposal was to develop a guideline on the use of target animal batch safety tests, with the stated goal of reducing the use of the test in order to reduce the use of animals. The informal poll of AVBC members found both support and opposition to use of animals in batch safety tests as a general concept. If the lab animal test would be replaced by an in vitro test, the costs could be a problem. If there is no release safety test, that may be an unacceptable risk for the animals which will receive the product.

Although the proposal was specific to target species safety tests, the EU proponents were uncertain whether the proposal was intended to cover lab animal tests as well. And there were differences of opinion on whether this would affect current U.S. product requirements. There was sufficient interest that EMEA was asked to write a concept paper to define the scope and goals of the guideline. This draft concept paper will be circulated for comment this fall; the plan is to have a final paper to vote on at the Steering Committee meeting in February. If approved, the Biologics Quality EWG could get to work on the guideline during 2009.

Mycoplasma Test Procedure: For a decade, the Biologics Quality Monitoring EWG has been trying to develop a guideline on testing vaccines for mycoplasma contamination. The effort has been hindered by problems producing the reference organisms, and the Americans and Europeans could not agree on a study protocol. It appears that this has all been sorted out and, this fall, a protocol will be adopted, and the reference materials will be distributed to the participants to validate the protocol.

Guideline on Target Animal Safety Testing for Biologics: The Steering Committee adopted the final version of this guideline (GL 44), which was circulated in draft form in 2007. Presumably, CVB will now publish this as a proposed VS Memorandum.

2008 CVB published VS Memoranda.                                                                        

General Licensing Considerations:  Backpassage Studies.  This is a replacement of VS Memorandum 800.201.  The text is little changed from the year 200 version which it replaces, except that the new version notes the adoption of BICH Guideline No. 41 on this subject.  The Memo states that CVB will accept studies which comply with VICH GL 41 as well as the Memo.  The old VS Memo included a table and a graph on probability of re-isolation; this is probably intended to be attached to the new Memo, but the version on the CVB website does not have these attachments or the VICH guideline.

 

 

 

 

CVB also published CVB Notice 08-13, dated July 23, 2008, which serves as a summary of the agency’s responses to the public comments that were submitted when the proposed guideline was published in late 2004.

Guidelines for Validation of In Vitro Potency Assays.  This is a new VS Memo 800.112, based on Memo Draft 110, which was originally published in March, 2007.  A principal criticism of the Draft 110, delivered by AVBC and others, was that the Draft Memo to a large extent assumed that the assays would be done with the ELISA method.  This prompted CVB to draft a new document which describes the elements on an analystical method.  The new draft was published in September 2007, and it received another round of comments from AVBC and several companies.  The final of VS Memo 800.112 retains the philosophy of general guidance, with the expectation that there will be other memos for specific analytic methods.  It appears that a number of the industry suggestions were accepted.

GB Texas Newcastle Disease Challenge Virus.  CVB published an updated version of VS Memo 800.95 to reflect the change in the regulatory status of the virus – it was classified as a select agent last year, so the strain can be possessed only by companies which have registered under the select agent program.

Master Seed at Alternate Locations.  APHIS has published new VS Memorandum No. 800.113, “Production, Testing and Storage of Master Seed and Master Cell Stocks at Alternate Locations.” The Memo provides guidelines on documentation and handling Master Seed and Master Cell Stocks which are obtained from premises other than the licensed facility (including imports). This “final” Memo incorporates some changes from the draft published a year ago; most of the changes seem to emphasize the licensee’s responsibility for the integrity of the materials.

Food Animal Residue Avoidance Databank (FARAD).  In August 2008, the American Veterinary Medical Association took the initiative to lobby for emergency funding for the Food Animal Residue Avoidance Databank (FARAD), a university-based consortium which gathers, analyzes, and reports on animal drug residue avoidance information.  The program, started in 1982, has been erratically funded as an earmark in the appropriations for the Center for Veterinary Medicine, but federal funds dried up as a result of the earmark “reform” in 2007, and the universities are cutting off subsistence funds for the databank as of September 30, 2008.  As a member of the Animal Agriculture Coalition, AVBC was asked to endorse this request, and the AVBC Executive Committee approved the action.  Thus, AVBC’s name was included on the letters from AVMA to members of Congress.   Update:  Donations from several organizations kept FARAD running until early 2009, when it received an $806,000 Congressional appropriation.  This amount is expected to sustain the program until the end of the year, without additional layoffs.

Discontinued Reagents.  The CVB announced that it will no longer supply licensees with the GB Texas strain of Newcastle Disease Virus, in CVB Notice 08-14, dated July 23, 2008.  The policy was effective immediately.  CVB stated that its supply is depleted, but the virus is available from the National Veterinary Services Laboratory and private sources.

CVB recently published Notice No. 08-16, announcing that Feline Rhinotracheitis Challenge Virus is no longer available from CVB. This was effective as of the date of the Notice, September 3, 2008.  A licensee’s reviewer should have information regarding alternate sources.

Debate on National Bio- and Agro-Defense Facility (NBAF).  The plans of the Department of Homeland Security to build the NBAF revisited the news in August 2008, as the possible neighbors begin to look at the implication of have these exotic disease organisms in their backyards.  A report by the Government Accountability Office released in May 2008 stated that DHS has not done a “true” assessment of the risks of bringing the FMD virus and other exotics to the mainland.  Additionally, on August 14, 2008, it was reported that DHS has confirmed plans to close the Plum Island facility when the new NBAF is completed, drawing a mixed reaction from Plum Island’s neighbors.

Animal Drug User Fee Legislation Renewed and Expanded.  On August 14, 2008, President Bush signed the Animal Drug User Fee Act Amendments (ADUFA II), extending the fee program for 5 years. The legislation increases the total CVM can collect each year for the existing new animal drug categories, and it authorizes CVM to collect fees for generic animal drug applications and registrations, as well. The fee in fiscal year (FY) 2007 was $168,600 for a new animal drug application, rising to $172,500 in FY 2008. There are also product fees, establishment fees, and sponsor fees. The rates have not yet been set for FY 2009, but the totals suggest that fees could jump. For FY 2008, CVM was authorized to collect a total of $11,600,000 from the various categories of fees. For FY 2009, the new legislation permits CVM to collect $15,260,000 for new animal drugs plus, for the first time, CVM can collect fees for generic drug applications in the amount of $4,831,000. In the final year, CVM is authorized to collect up to $24,244,000 in new animal drug fees and $6,031,000 in generic animal drug fees. The Senate appropriations bill for FY 2009 would appropriate $71,824,000 for CVM operations, to be supplemented by $15,260,000 in user fees.

 D361 Comments Filed.  The comments on D361 (proposed revisions to the Administrative Inspection Review process) have been submitted to CVB by John Thomas. Two brief points were made. First, we indicated AVBC’s support for the proposed changes to reduce the reporting burden. Second, AVBC expressed a need for more guidance from CVB before it implements its proposal to add a “focus question” on the status of expiration dating of licenses products.

Extension of Dating.  In July 2008, CVB published Biologics Notice No. 08-15 ,announcing the extension of the dating of two standard reference bacterins.  The Salmonella typhimurium Standard Reference Bacterin Lot No. IRP 460 is extended until June 30, 2009, and the Salmonella dublin Standard Reference Bacterin IRP SDB-3 is extended to September 30, 2009.  In each case, the extension will expire if a new reference is qualified.

At the end of 2008, CVB published Biologics Notice No. 08-20, extending the dating on Pasteurella Multocida standard reference bacterins, while the laboratory completes the validation of new references.  The Notice also states that for the Salmonella Choleraesuis bacterin, CVB is evaluating the maintenance of the bacterin.

Association Matters

AVBC welcomed new members.  At its April 7, 2008 business meeting in Ames, Iowa, AVBC welcomed three new members.  Immucell Coporation, of Portland, Maine, joined as an Active member; Avipath, LLC, of Lenexa, Kansas, joined as an Associate member; and BioBuiness Consultants of Galena, Illinois joined as an Independent Consultant.  Welcome!

At the September 17, 2008 annual meeting, the AVBC Membership voted on the applications for five new members, welcoming Epitopix of Willmar, Minnesota, Hygieia Biological Laboratories of Woodland, CA, and Sirrah-Bios Inc. of Ames, Iowa, as Active Members; and Espeseth Consulting of Perkasie, PA and John Mitzel Consulting of Ames, Iowa, as Independent Consultants, into our membership.

AVBC Officers.  AVBC officers were elected at the fall business meeting. Ted Girshick of Charles River Laboratories will continue as President for the second year of his term; Jeff Trunnell of Fort Dodge Animal Health is the Vice President; and Joe O’Donnell of IDEXX Laboratories and Jerry Chapman of Merial Select will continue as Treasurer and Secretary, respectively.