Meetings

2009 Spring Meeting

2008 Fall Meeting

2008 Spring Meeting

2007 Fall Meeting

Meetings

The Association of Veterinary Biologics Companies meets twice a year, in the spring and fall.

The 2011 Fall meeting is scheduled for September 27 -28, in Ames, Iowa. Please contact AVBC at 703-506-1050 for more information.


2011 Spring Meeting

Ames, Iowa

April 26-27, 2011

AVBC welcomes Proliant Health and Biologicals, ProtaTek International, Inc., and KT Connection as new members.  


2010 Fall Meeting

Ames, Iowa

September 7-8, 2010


2010 Spring Meeting

Ames, Iowa

April 7-8, 2010

AVBC welcomes new members.  


2009 Fall Meeting

Ames, Iowa

September 29-30, 2009

AVBC welcomes new members.  


2009 Spring Meeting

Ames, Iowa

March 16-17, 2009

Please check back for further details.


2008 Fall Meeting                

Ames, Iowa

September 17-18, 2008

The 2008 Fall Meeting was held on September 17 and 18 in Ames, Iowa. We welcomed five new member companies: 3 active members, Epitopix, Hygieia Biological Laboratories, and Sirrah Bios, and two independent consultants, Espeseth Consulting and John Mitzel Consulting. Following are the opening remarks of President Ted Girshick.

“Kelli gave me an hour and a half to talk, but I’m neither creative nor articulate enough to talk that long, so I’ll try to be brief.

Why are we here in Ames ? Why do we exist as an organization? Because 13 years ago some folks in our industry, seeing a growing threat by forces wishing to see our industry operate under a GMP system as in Europe, decided to establish an organization that would work to uphold the US system of regulations based on the 9CFR . So far, we’ve been successful, but the threat has not gone away. To the contrary, the continuing budgetary shortfall situation that CVB has endured is only getting worse and this has led to considerations by CVB of various means to maintain operational integrity, including user fees or a shift towards a GMP system.

We all know what this means:  increased costs to our firms. And with that, the repercussions of increased prices, customer unhappiness, and even discontinued products. I think we’ve all seen the first effects of CVB’s budgetary problems:  slowed review times and less frequent inspections, to name the obvious. And as we’ll see in our discussions here, the situation can and will get worse.

 As we left our recent meeting with Cindy Smith and John Clifford of APHIS, in which we beseeched them to make CVB funding APHIS’ top priority but were told to keep working on Congress for the money, Bob Tully turned to me and asked: “so what are you going to tell the troops?” I hadn’t thought about that yet, but my response was that I’d tell you all to “think of these as the “Good Old Days”. We must re-double our efforts to convince Congress that appropriate, increased funding for CVB is an absolute necessity and is not “pork” as we’ve heard some in Washington believe. And it is not in the interests of “Big Pharmaceuticals” as some others ignorantly think. But it IS for The National Good….for our firms, for livestock producers, for pet owners, and for ALL our citizens.

Our industry is small but extremely potent. Our products have a far-reaching impact on our economy and all our people. How would it be for all of us if on Thanksgiving we couldn’t enjoy our traditional turkey, because it was either unavailable or so costly that only the rich could enjoy it? This is not imminent but neither is it far-fetched. We are businesses and as such have to have profits to survive. And as we all know, this isn’t easy and it’s not forgiving. So we have to work hard to defend ourselves in order to have that vaccine that allows that turkey to be delivered to our table in the future.

For AVBC, it’s been a reasonably good year. We’ve gotten some new members and have 3 new applicants today. But with over 100 licensees and many, many allied firms, we can do much better. We all need to keep putting the word out about AVBC and encourage others to join. We’re all busy and have a lot of responsibilities and none of our members are AVBC employees, but we can take the moments of opportunity to talk to prospective members about this organization and urge them to take a look at us. Membership is our life blood.

As touched on before, in the past year we’ve made more efforts on the CVB funding front: letters have been written and sent to members of Congress, we’ve aligned with the Animal Agriculture Coalition in support of increased appropriations, and we’ve made a personal visit to APHIS Administration. It was noted during that meeting how strange it was that a group from industry was asking a government agency to support more funding for themselves. Unusual it may be, but needed for our own good, nonetheless. While I wouldn’t characterize our results a success yet, we must continue. And as I said, we were strongly encouraged by Cindy Smith to do so.

It’s like something I saw on Seinfeld once: Jerry’s friend George tells him that ending a relationship is like trying to knock over a Coke machine: you don’t just walk up to it and knock it over, you have to go up to it and start getting it to rock. And you just keep on rocking it until finally it reaches the tipping point and over it goes. Maybe it’s like that with Congress…we just keep on bugging them until we accomplish our goal.

In the past year we’ve had a couple of controversies in AVBC too. Our position on user fees had some differences of opinion. I think we learned something from that about effective communication within the organization and how to do that better and also how to best achieve our position of “One Voice” for our industry. We also had some conversations about VICH and its usefulness or lack of, and the need to get back to the agreed upon priorities we’ve established for our organization and what we hope CVB will respond to positively. This will be discussed later.

Through cost-cutting, membership restructuring, and gaining new members, AVBC solvency is much better today than it was a year ago. Joe will show you the numbers shortly.

Our challenges for the next year are much the same as last year. They continue to be recruitment and CVB funding. Our goals should be to have 30 members at this meeting next year and to see a 2010 budget for CVB that allows all positions to be filled and the new Center for Animal Health fully operational.

Thank you.”


2008 Spring Meeting 

Ames, Iowa

April 7, 2008

The 2008 Spring meeting was held on Monday, April 7, 2008, in Ames, Iowa, in conjunction with the APHIS Public Meeting scheduled for April 7-9. We welcomed three new members: ImmuCell Corporation, Avipath, LLC and BioBusiness Consultants.


2007 Fall Meeting

Ames, Iowa

October 29-30, 2007

The October 29-30 meeting was a great success. We welcomed 2 new active members, Diamond/Heska and Newport Labs, and an associate member, Milliken Associates. Besides the addition of these new members, we also approved the new membership dues structure that we believe will encourage more firms to join our great organization in the coming months. The work of the ad hoc committee on strategic planning was also presented and discussed. Of particular importance was the expression of what we, as members, feel the Center for Veterinary (CVB) priorities should be. CVB has repeatedly sought feedback from AVBC as to what we think their priorities should be and we will continue to emphasize these points to Dr. Hill, Dr. Rippke, and Mr. Karli as we move forward.

John Thomas presented our concerns about CVB rule-making activities (rule-making by Memo) and Dr. Rippke made some helpful comments that firms should challenge their reviewers when they cite “rules” based on Memos. It was stated that CVB felt the memos were intended as guidelines for firms to allow flexibility in accomplishing compliance rather than codified, inflexible regulations.

During our second day, Dr. Hill presented CVB’s budgetary problems and it is clear that the several years of under-funding has made CVB less than fully functional. A strong and capable CVB is in our best interests and we will make our best efforts to positively influence CVB funding.

We heard about State Veterinarian issues from Dr. Sam Holland, President-elect of the National Association of State Veterinarians, which was insightful into the concerns of State Veterinarians in general when it comes to allowing biologics to be used in a State. We also heard an informative presentation on shipping infectious materials from David Hebrank of Saf-T-Pak, and an update on the recent VICH meeting in Japan from Bob Tully and Dr. Byron Rippke.

Of special interest was a lively roundtable discussion on Draft Memo 110, in vitro potency testing. Participants from AVBC were Tom Hickey from Fort Dodge and Helen Smith from Schering-Plough, and Drs. Dusek and Siev from CVB. While this memo is intended as a broad “umbrella” document for use as a general guideline for development of in vitro potency tests to replace current in vivo methods and it has the desirable intent to “Refine-Reduce-Replace” animal testing, many concerns were expressed regarding technical points of these memos and also a major concern that reviewers were imposing this draft memo as the now-current “rule.” This was made very clear to Dr. Rippke and we expect reviewers to be properly advised on this issue.